This can depend on *how* processed and *how* read. Even in the realm of Digital Humanities (as recently convincingly argue for me by the STG visitor Martin Mueller) there are affordances of reading that are offered by word lists that can be even traditionally/conventionally 'literary' in terms of affect and significance. Algorithms offer alternative strategies of reading and writing that humans may well determine to be literary or not. By the quality of algorithmic does not necessarily imply 'not literary'.
