Bubbles_glow

≡ Literary Systems ≡

 
Corner_fold
  • Citation
  • Extension
  • Response
  • Comment
Hopo_catalog
 
Flowchart_grey_24

The Tangled Dance of Theory and the Future

We must be wary of the rhetoric of the electronic sublime. We must look skeptically at myths of future digital revolutions. Many times, we dream of what a certain technology will do for us, and it turns out to be something that we wish we'd do for ourselves. The electric light, for example, was once imagined to be a revolutionary force for human culture. It was said that having electric lights in the home would produce a host of family cottage industries, allowing the husband to spend more time in the house, and thereby lowering divorce rates. The phonograph, when invented by Edison, was intended as a way to record one's personal thoughts and send them to friends. Television was originally hailed as a revolution for education. The original predictions about the potentials of hypertext now read like similarly strange dreams. When hypertext theorists embraced it as the embodiment of post-structuralism, their wish was, perhaps, for more authors to write texts amenable to those theories.


 
"Theories of literature have a powerful ability to co-opt new fields and fill theoretical vacuums, and in such a process of colonization, where the 'virgin territory' lacks theoretical defense, important perspectives and insights might be lost or at least overlooked"

— Espen Aarseth (Cybertext)